may happen in cases in which a building administrator for one reason or another has not paid all the bills for the year accounting basis or utility bills, such as the aqueduct. If you are in fact a takeover of a new director at the time of handover, the new administrator will have the framework or rather should have the full picture of the financial situation of the condominium. The unpaid bills will be expected to be marked as such, as if they remained unresolved, there must be a reason, for example, the condominiums have not paid in due time the quotas and the administrator was not able to pay them. In doing so, once the arrears are paid allowances, the building will dell'amministrtore then hand in the situation of cash to meet expenditure arrears. If instead we are faced with a budget close to balance or otherwise notifies the invoices as paid, but in reality this is not the case, then will be the duty of compensation for the costs of building that should have supported and instead did not. Let me explain: if there is a budget bill of the aqueduct, marked as paid and condominium units have all been paid, there is no reason why the administrator has paid such costs: this means absolutely clear that the Administrative he "pocketed" the money. E 'then the new task manager to ensure that these amounts should be returned to the building, including through legal appeals. This example is a somewhat rare cases in which bad faith, an administrator receives the shares without paying the expenses of the condominium building. In modern times, similar situations is very rare to see, but nevertheless it is possible that you can run into similar unpleasant situations.
